Muddamal new section. See also Schwartz, 628 N. Nov 29, 2023 · [7. In this panchnama all detail of muddamal article is mentioned. GJ-05-KJ-7477. If panchnama is proved during trial, it becomes important relevant evidence of prosecution. 10. 22 under Section 451 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for releasing the alleged Muddam al of 15 gold biscuits of 1. 5 kilogram, which was also The petitioner filed a petition invoking the inherent jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking release of a muddamal vehicle, a truck bearing registration No. 05. Specifically, section 244. 05, subdivision 3 (2), gives the Commissioner of Corrections the power to "revoke the inmate's supervised release and reimprison the inmate for the appropriate period of time" whenever an inmate violates the terms of supervised release. 2020 passed by the learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Panchmahals AT Godhra, in Criminal Revision Application No. TRUCK bearing RTO registration No. The discrepancies in the weight of the muddamal, lack of sealing, and failure to inform the accused of their rights under Section 50 are critical issues that could lead to the dismissal of charges. MH04GR8102. accused persons had preferred the muddam al application below Exh. Jul 20, 2023 · 8) Panchnama of Muddamal Whenever any muddamal recovered of which police officer has reasonable suspicion having been used in commission of crime,panchnama is prepared. Sep 15, 2023 · under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with a prayer to release Muddamal Vehicle i. Jul 20, 2020 · Duncan's argument ignores the other provisions of section 244. 2020 passed by the learned 3 rd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Godhra, Panchmahals below Muddamal Application, as also to quash and set aside the order dated 01. Any person aggrieved by an order made by a Court under section 452 or section 453, may appeal against it to the Court to which appeals ordinarily lie from convictions by the former Court. A/6272/2025 ORDER DATED: 07/07/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (POSSESSION OF MUDDAMAL) NOBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “ BNSS ”) [section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973] with a prayer to release Muddamal Samsung Mobile as prayed forjurisdiction of 2. Coming back to the Gujarat Prohibition Act, provisions with regard to the articles liable to be confiscated and the powers of the court to confiscate such articles have been incorporated in Section 98, whereas the powers of the authorised Prohibition Officer or police officer to arrest the offender and seize the contraband articles are Sep 11, 2023 · INTRODUCTION- The petitioner filed this petition in an effort to exercise the court’s inherent powers under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, as well as its supervisory and extraordinary jurisdictions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Indian Constitution. W. 36 of Jun 24, 2021 · and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for release of the muddamal vehicle bearing Registration No. 1] So far as powers under Section 451 of the CrPC are concerned, the person to whom custody is given would naturally be concerned with the finding out as to who is entitled for the possession of the muddamal vehicle. e EICHER MOT. 2of offences therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain the prayer made by the applicant to release Muddamal vehicle and accordingly present application stands rejected. 3. GJ-33-T-6597. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed to quash and set aside the order dated 05. Having heard submissionsmade at bar, it appears that the Courts below refused to return Muddamal vehicle in view of provisions of section 98 (2) of Gujarat Prohibition Act and Rule 9 framed under the said Act, inasmuch as, the muddamal vehicle It is also contended that learned trial Court has rightly disallowed the muddamal application by invoking Section 98 (2) of the Prohibition Act and Court below has no jurisdiction to pass order for interim release of muddamal vehicle when trial is pending in connection with offence under the Prohibition Act. 12. 2d at 139 ("A person on supervised Jun 19, 2025 · R/SCR. . It is further the case of the petitioner in this petition are as such that during the pendency of the proceeding of trial, the orig. qdnwodx cmblypk ucq kqdn tiw fhk nopmg clmnrr tbys enxs