Tiger vs grizzly bear reddit

Grizzly's best chance is to run away and hope the hippo dies of old age first. Insanely thick layer of blubber armor prevents the grizzly from making any headway at all towards seriously injuring the hippo. All the battle zone with blood spattered with earth and trees had a length of 30 m. I think the tiger is a better predator, fighter, in general, but the polar bear is just too big, and too powerful. 35 votes, 26 comments. (There are freaks but I'm just going with the max stats provided by wikipedia. A hippo is twice the size of a bear, and aggressive. I highly doubt a tiger would beat a grizzly bear in a fear fight, so lets take the strongest type of tiger the Siberian tiger and compare it to the grizzly bear. An adult female Grizzly is going to be north of 700 pounds and the adult males can top out at 1700 pounds. I think 15 regular humans would stand a chance against a grizzly bear, so Mike and his Grizzlys can weigh 4 times this. I'm pretty sure a Polar bear is pretty close to, if not the most dominant land predator on the planet, just because they are so large. The distinction you’re making between grizzly bears and Kodiak bears is a little bit iffy, grizzly is just a term for inland brown bears of which the two are almost identical. I'd have to go with a Grizzly Bear. Archived post. Polar bears vs Siberian tigers. Elephant will weigh about 6000 KG. the siberian tiger is faster but they maul and bite. The big cat might be fast and deadly enough to take the Grizzly. From Wikipedia : The effect the presence of tigers has on brown bear behavior seems to vary. Tigers are quite literally 3x the size of a Leopard. Grizzly bears advantages: bite force of 1160 they weigh up to 600 pounds have thicker fur. Big tigers weigh around 250kg (560lbs), so the bear still has the weight advantage. The jaguar jumps on the Bears back and tears at its spine but the bear manages to shake it off. Much closer fight. I think sketchy reports have pointed out that tigers can kill bears. both have the same bite force, silverback no weapons, grizzly has daggers for nails. 5/ 10 grizzly. Bear shotguns a tall boy and let’s out a bro war-cry. Had an intense argument with 3 kids from my school on who would win in a fight a gorilla or a grizzly bear. At parity I favor a lioness over a bear. The polar bear is the largest and most powerful terrestrial carnivore on earth; a creature almost without equal. This is the home of all things terrifying. All the bear’s homies cheer him on. All are bigger (I think), have thick skin to withstand the Grizzly's attacks and have formidable weapons (tusks, horns). Bears have a habit of not dying as well. I'd venture there is a reasonable overlap between Tigers and Grizzlies though. Claws: Toss up, the bear has 4 inch front claws, but the lion has 3 inch claws and it has 4 claws vs 2. . The bear wins this. 13. Grizzly vs Moose happens a lot irl and the overwhelming majority of the time the winner is the one with jaws that can rip open a car. The old size estimates for Gigantopithecus blacki were greatly exaggerated, with a new study indicating 300 kg might be an overestimate as well. They would chase away the bear, and in a fight to the death, 2 average lionesses should be enough to beat an average bear due Ligers are neat, and they are certainly large enough that they'd appear to be a good match for a grizzly, but in reality a large tiger stands a much better chance of beating a grizzly than a Liger does. Mike Tyson plays with his tiger, so I don’t see how 15 prime Mike Tysons would lose against a bear. . According to google, largest weight for grizzly bear is 1,600 lbs vs Siberian tiger 950 lbs. 6m. Massively more powerful than a lion. lazerbem. gunggi351. I would guess bear. Tigers prey on large animals: deer, moose, wild boars, and, yes, bears. they’re almost double the weight and much bulkier. Assuming we are talking the biggest ones a Grizzly wins probably also if it's an average one of each animal. The team is allowed to use the field to their advantage and choose their starting arrangements. Siberian Tiger. I told them the Bear is a lot bigger has claws teeth stronger and faster, they refused that a Grizzly Bear would win. Kodiak Bear: weigh up to 1,500 pounds. Otherwise, only chance a lion has is sneaking up on the bear. The Grizzly is probably faster (there's some debate on a T-Rex's top speed, between 40-70km/h, Grizzly is about 55km/h), but that's only good for staying alive. Here you'll find all things dark, creepy, scary and terrifying (paranormal stuff, ghosts, urban legends, creepy videos, hauntings etc. These are multiple wolves. A grizzly bear could likely fuck up pretty much any other large predator. Polar bears have the highest bite force of any carnivorous land mammal. Or a Siberian Tiger, which can be 800 pounds and have longer claws could fight a female grizzly. Please read the sidebar before posting and be kind to one another. Bonus: A gorilla, Grizzly, Chimp and Both animals are males in the primes of their lives. They would never meet in the wild. im dying either way, best to make it quick. The fact that it's in a barn makes it worse for the horse. 1. The tiger would probably be the one fighing the bear for the most part and tigers are like, super strong. Grizzly's are built for this type of scenario ,they are heavier, and have very thick muscles/fur that makes it so the Tiger has limited avenues for winning. Sabertooth Tigers didn’t use their teeth. Real question. Pitting the smallest of Big cats Vs the Smallest is like a Heavy weight champ vs a A grizzly bears shoulder hump generates enough force to move thousands of pounds. Thick armor, super high pain threshold, and ridiculous strength. Elephant, Rhino, Hippo. Gorilla cannot tank being sliced by claws. Be the first to comment Nobody's responded to this post yet. Round Two: The coach is the average zoologist. Once you enter you can never leave. 5 feet, and their height is up to 5. All that extra mass isn't appropriated properly. Round One: The coach is the average football coach. Even if it manages to do that, that's far from a guaranteed win. They used their jaw muscles to smash their preys trachea or skull. Grizzly bears can hunt, and are pretty damn good at it, but Grizzly bears are also very good at holding their ground, which gives them a huge advantage in a fight like this. They are thicker, and they have more powerful swipes than a tiger. com They are one of the biggest tiger subspecies, with the Bengal tiger being comparable in size. Their Claws. A drunk zookeeper lets a lion into the bear enclosure A grizzly–polar bear hybrid (also named grolar bear, pizzly bear, zebra bear, grizzlar, or nanulak) is a rare ursid hybrid that has occurred both in captivity and in the wild. it's the same reason we have weight classes for combat sports too! Think of a 70 pound dog fighting a 150 pound dog. Gorilla google weight - 100 to 270kg. The biggest Polar Bear is 10 feet long. Hippo can easily rip a grizzly's limb off with a single bite, or just straight up snap its head off. A lioness averages some 130kgs and a grizzly 180-360kgs. Tigers are also much stronger. Tiger eats bear to be more accurate. So for arguments sake lets they met in a zoo. Siberian Tiger advantages: can run up to 50mph 4 inches claw length teeth 3 inches long more One case of a trainer who had bears and tigers in his act - a tiger and a bear got upset with each other, the tiger was about 600 lbs and the bear only about 300 (young bear), the trainer thought he was going to need to get a new bear, but the bear broke the tigers neck with a single blow. The bear has a shot but tigers are designed to kill. Tigers on the other hand, are solo hunters, and would get the jump on either bear, but I don't think it could take out a grizzly bear even, bears are big. If a bull can get those horns in the right place it could definitely change the outcome. Polar bears vs Siberian tigers : r/whowouldwin. The bear would win easily, since it's bigger, with better natural weapons, armor and fighting instincts. ed_spaghet12. a chimpanzee is about 120 pounds and got nothing except a slightly stronger bite than a human. The bear was chained to even the fight because bears are significantly better equipped to win. Maybe a liiiiiiitle weaker than the tiger. From what I know tigers generally are the most powerful unless ligers size means they are better predators. R8) This is the only cat that stands a decent chance. Tigers are bigger than gorillas, have a more dangerous bite, claws, better killing technique, and are tougher skinned. 8fenristhewolf8. Once "it's on", a grizzly is terrifying. The lion is getting underestimated in this thread (though I believe the bear wins) Grizzly 9/10. In a face off the bear (except for the smaller breed of bear) by force alone would win. id fight a tiger. 😆. The T-Rex is estimated to have weighed in at 15,000 pounds. note: The skin is a little stronger than Kevlar. Grizzly wins then as normal, they're not some smaller Sloth Bear. • 11 yr. The heaviest polar bears 1500 pounds. ). Round 3: Smilodon and Tiger team up to fight a pack of Dire Wolves. I feel like the bear should win without much trouble, but at the same time, there're more accounts of lions defeating bears than bears defeating lions - although not by much iirc/to my knowledge - and despite the lion being a far better fighter than the tiger, it would at the very least mean that the tiger could have a shot, being a similar animal to the lion and even a bit bigger. a 300 lb herbivore. and look how he does against bears. Grizzly Bear wins due to size, then Tiger, then Silverback Gorilla. Despite Gorilla's "big guy" reputation, Bear is also physically stronger, IIRC. Razor sharp claws. On average, a hippo's length is between 10. The bear always won because it had lots of fur and fat to protect against the tigers teeth and claws, the tiger would put on a good show but it has a weak skeletal structure and the bear always crushed the tiger under it's immense weight and powerful swipes and stomps. First off the lion would be almost useless besides attacking and even then it wouldn't be that useful. Siberian Tiger - Hold it;s own against it’s own kind Zpalq. Grizzly also has paws with 2 to 4-inch long claws. Round 2: Biggest Smilodon versus (~950lbs) versus Grizzly Bear of similar weight. Senatius. Then again, Hugh Glass was probably a demigod or something. Grizzly Bear vs Bengal Tiger (I swear, what's with mfers thinking modern-day animals stand a chance against a T-Rex in a 1v1 lmfao?) kevvinreddit. The Grizzly Bear is bloodlusted. One bear paw to the face fucks the tiger up and he runs away. Reply. 9/10. Grizzlies have been documented bringing down full grown Bison. They can swim non-stop at 6mph for over a week. 8 and 16. Tigers are incomprehensibly strong compared to humans. In 2006, the occurrence of this hybrid in nature was confirmed by testing the DNA of a unique-looking bear that had been shot near Sachs Harbour, Northwest Territories Polar bears are over twice as massive as tigers. According to a Google search a bear can lift a 600 pound rock with one paw. It's the Grizzly Bear and it's not even close. Polar bears are insulated by two layers of fur and a four-inch thick fat layer. PImpathinor. Longer claws, bigger teeth, and heavier. The bear is larger on all fronts. Grizzly bear would win, male lions fight each other from time to time and spend the rest of their days laying in the shade, the Grizzly is the king of the coniferous forests. The size advantage the grizzly has here wouldn't save him from a bunch of bloodlusted lionesses due to territory and cubs. Not a fight the bear would fancy. ~1500 pounds vs ~1000 pounds. Scan this QR code to download the app now. So I'd say the tiger at least 5/10 the bear. Polar Bear - Enough force to destroy a thick layer of ice. Sabers weighed 1100 lbs. Round Three: The two coaches are Steve Irwin and Bill Belichick. Polar bears are larger. Polar bears are the world’s largest land predator - more than twice the size of a Siberian tiger. A Grizzly bear is a subspecies of Brown bear that lives in North America. Male Siberian tigers are around 400 lbs or so. The bear has a crazy size advantage on the tiger, being some 900 to 1,000 lbs for an average adult while Siberian tigers are 390-400 lbs on average. Siberian tigers are agile, fast, and excellent hunters. The bear eats him alive. It is also larger at max weights. An average hippo weighs 3-4 times that. Grizzly bears are on average, 400-790 lbs for males and 290-400 lbs for females, both of which are very similar to a Bengal or Siberian tiger. However, the tiger’s teeth are thinner and longer, which means that it can bite its food deeply and cause deeper wounds. Hippo takes round 2 10/10. Comparatively weaker. A much better equipped knight that's actually expecting a fight isn't going to lose. •. Nothing going for the gorilla against a grizzly besides shitting itself in fear. 2. Grizzly bears have several populations larger than Siberian tigers and so would win more. It takes many lions to kill a hippo and they have a low success rate. There blood lusted and Start 5 m Apart. The bear was chained to a tree in the bull's coral which meant the bull would attack. A large male Tiger I should have no problem dealing with 8 wolves. The hippo tears the bear to pieces. If the bear is 3 times bigger the tiger will lose, but a tiger can kill same sized bear or a bear bigger than itself. Didn't Romans or something used to make bears and lions fight and bears would litterally 1HKO the lions. while that's all the bear will pretty much use it's strength for + the bear has 10 2-4 claws on its front feet to use as weapons . Cats don't rely on raw size to hunt, they need a lot of leg muscle to have explosiveness, and The grizzly would be scared shitless and try to run. Full grown 8 ft 1,500 pound male polar bear. If the grizzly bear was a Kodiak or a Polar bear then the tiger would get mauled much quicker. that’s 2x more than an inland grizzlies weight. The male North American grizzly bear weighs between 400 - 790 pounds, with an average weight of 500 pounds or so. Assuming both combatants are average adult males, the grizzly will have a size advantage, weighing 400-800 pounds vs the gorilla's 300-400 pounds. ) Both ideally in a spot with little terrain to hide. They'll be screaming too. Tigers are ambush predators, not to mention they weight less than the bears. Unless the horse turns around and kicks the bear directly in the head, it's done. Grizzly Bear google height - 2m. The gorilla may be stronger (maybe; bears are damn strong too), but the grizzly has claws and teeth more suited to fighting. Here is a polar bear against some walruses. It doesn't. The bigger you are, the more dangerous, size = strength. The heaviest grizzlies are 790 pounds. There is a lion enclosure right next to a bear enclosure. Hippo 10/10. Bears are strapped with the claws, teeth, and range of motion to kill. However, unlike the lion, tigers are solitary creatures and share territory with brown bears albeit not as large as the big grizzlies of N. Average grizzly bear and Siberian tiger are similar in size, and both hunt similar prey such as elk and deer. also size wise, i think grizzly bears are slightly bigger (400-600 pounds vs a gorillas 400-500) Polar Bears are extremely prone to overheating and the a lion would keep feinting until the Polar Bear started keeling over. You're going to need at least two lions. • 6 yr. Hippo: males weigh 3,500 to 9,920 pounds and females weigh 3,000 pounds. I gotta give it to Hippos team, Hippos are basically fast biological tanks with a bite that can, well, take a guess if it can crush watermelons like fortune cookies. Then again grizzly bears are like if you gave tigers a much bigger body and more power. The biggest tiger with an empty stomach is supposedly a 288kg bengal tiger but I've not seen verification/proof of it, regardless the biggest should be in the 270kg range. Grizzly bears, on the other hand, are incredibly strong and have powerful jaws and sharp claws, making them formidable opponents. When desperate lions will try to kill hippos. 5 on all fours and at least 8 feet on hind legs. The bear holds the edge in stamina, durability, stability, and leverage. And if they still lose hard make his bones and joints 2x stronger. 3-4 Kodiaks or 5-6 Grizzlies using average sized males to take down an average sized male African Bull Elephant assuming the bears are working together. In the other case (12 August 2001), the tiger, after harassment on a slope, attacked a bear 8-10 years of age weighing 150-200 kg. Tigers have other more potent natural weapons in their claws, but that makes little difference with the polar bear's thick coat of fur and fat. In this case it was a grizzly vs African lion. The T-Rex is 40 feet long. OP • 6 yr. Bear wins 9. Bears and tigers grow fast, so three year old ones should be near enough adults. A hippo is bigger than a Kodiak standing on its rear legs. Bear populations vary in weight a lot. This is 6 times the weight of a male Walrus which loan male Polar Bears are unable to take down, Polar Bears are slightly larger than a Kodiak and much larger Battle. It is stronger than a bigfoot if they exist. Beasts several meters rolled down clinging. • 15 yr. Tigers get up to 600 pounds and brown bears get up to 600 kg. The bear always wins. they go for the neck so i would die faster. The male variant is known for its impressive 88mm rifled cannon that can easily pierce the turret front of an M4 Sherman which has more armour than a Large Grey Wolf. Hmm, tough call but i would say 7. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. If the gorilla loses toss in a Chimp with bullet proof skin until he wins. What is the gorilla supposed to do but fold? A 600 lb predator vs. Full grown 11 ft 700 pound male siberian tiger. A Bull would get fucking slaughtered. Knocked out on the spot the site is 10 × 8 m. Round 1: Animals are of a similar weight. Grizzly Bear vs 3 Pitbulls discussion. The grizzly has a 2-300 pound weight advantage on the adult male lion, not to mention the fact that the female lions generally do the hunting for the pride. The average weight of a male gorilla is anywhere from 310-450 pounds, while a male grizzly bear averages from 400 to 600 pounds, so the bear has the weight advantage. 900 pounds of bear absolutely shitstomps 360 pounds of ape. Add your thoughts and get the conversation going. bigs cats generally win against larger adversaries because killing is in their training and dna from birth but bears are 10. And fights end in favor of the tiger 2-1. it wouldn’t be too effective against a kodiak bear at peak physique. The females average about 1230 pounds, males about 2000 as these appear to be the Atlantic subspecies. A black bear would lose against a tiger. • 4 yr. 7/10 times Hippo team wins if they can kill the grizzly first, 3/10 times Grizzly team wins if they all target the hippo Takes places in a savannah. Lions are not weak individually at all. That's recent, and based on a true story. Grizzly Bear google shoulder height - 1m. I could see a Sabertooth crushing an Inland Grizzly but if we’re talking Kodiak then the Kodiak wins 8/10. Round Four: The NFL players are all allowed to take What is it with people exaggerating the strength of bears? If we’re talking a male grizzly bear and assuming he is bloodlusted, First of all, the title clearly said Black Bear not grizzly so you might want to actually read the prompt. The jaguar stalks the bear as the bear is confused and worried in this new environment. a grizzly bear is about 900 pounds, has a hella strong bite, and has claws. This fight would be far better serviced by one of the smaller varieties of bear and a bigger tiger, like the Bengal, and at weight parity, I'd give a small edge to the Be the first to comment Nobody's responded to this post yet. Notice how the polar bear does nothing to them. 22 votes, 19 comments. avg silverback weights around 180 kg (400 pounds), avg grizzly weights around 600 kg (1300 pounds). The tiger I would back up here. These big cat vs bear fights were common during the gold rush in America. The grizzly’s robust haw shuts with a biting force of 1250 PSI whereas the tiger’s force reaches 950 PSI, which is strong enough to tear apart a bone. Award. The Real Housewives of Atlanta; The Bachelor; Sister Wives; 90 Day Fiance; Wife Swap; The Amazing Race Australia; Married at First Sight; The Real Housewives of Dallas The gorilla may be stronger over all but its not strength that is used for afflicting damage or for killing its prey. Bears are much better at standing on their back limbs than tigers which allow them to fighter better. I'd pick bear over lion one on one. It's possible the bear would die eventually, but that Komodo isn't walking away. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Some black bears can win, but most aren’t big enough. They inhabit We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Overall cats have much superior weaponry compared to bears, better reflexes, much more agile and explosive. A hungry polar bear would see a stray lion as food. If bigfoot does exist they would occupy the same territory as bear in a co-habitual sense. They said a Gorilla standing on his legs is a lot faster, has longer arms big teeth is stronger and could rip Polar bears are the strongest out of all 6 by a significant margin and grizzlies are also very strong. The fight between a tiger and a sloth bear was captured by Akshay Kumar, chief naturalist at Bamboo Forest Safari Lodge, when he was leading a safari with tourists. I think a Tiger is perfectly capable of hunting and killing a grizzly bear (assuming they are similarly Both will be 3 years old. strength advantage. The Gorilla definitely loses though. Polar bears have been known to drag orca whales out of the water and kill them. Siberian tigers hunt a subspecies of brown bear that get to roughly Kodiak size. i would rather encounter a bear in the wild. It’s true that the tiger is trained, but that’s still pretty crazy. Hell, look at the Revenant. A grizzly bear weighs maybe 1000 lbs at most. The video of an angry tiger, fighting with an equally furious bear was captured Wednesday at the Tadoba National Park in Maharashtra, India. Kodiak bears are still grizzly bears, they’ve evolved a little bit in isolation as to become a sub species but the differences are very small overall. A tiger is a focused fighter, a grizzly is a fucking berserker. Grizzly bear low dif. 10. 235K subscribers in the polls community. Lubert808. Or check it out in the app stores In the days of the wild west, entertainment included bear/bull fights. The bear takes down the tiger 8/10 times. America. The bear approaches the injured animal and grabs its neck, starting to ferociously shake the life out of it. Grizzlies regularly prey on moose in the wild, especially in the spring. You dont fuck with polar bears. Stronger, heavier, fights more often. Bear claws can be 4in which is twice jaguar average. Weight advantage. Bear wins most of the time but I think a bull has a chance. How many dogs does it take to throw down the time travelling tag team tigers? They have different hunting techniques, in fact the polar bear is the only one that actively hunts, so we are going to talk about it. Brown bear 680kg. Definitely the Leopard - it was a considerably more advanced panzerkampfwagen than the Tiger no matter how you put it. Polars bears consistently get much larger so it would win the most. The latter account for 5% of all main courses on the tiger menu (true, they are mostly Himalayan bears). Siberian Tiger - 3. Also, the way a tiger kills I don’t think is gonna work on something that big. bears knock you down and eat your somach. The tiger's advantages will be its explosive power, killing know-how, swiftness, long canines, and sharp claws. See full list on animalhype. My coworker and i, are having an discussion about an potential Fight between these two animals. ) Grizzly Bears are much shorter at 6 feet in length. Bear: 99 BFQ Even using an average grizzly bear in the study - 251kg - and a way below average lion - 162kg instead of 200kg - their BF were still almost the same, 1409N for the bear against 1314N for the lion. Bear takes it 7/10 there's always that lucky swing. • 3 yr. Grizzly claws can be 4 inches. Send him a pic showcasing the power of bear claws (NSFL) and he’ll see why grizzly bear demolishes. but i would rather fight a tiger. That's a Grizzly fighting a Polar bear! There's no denying a Grizzly can be more aggressive, but bears usually fight standing up, and a Polar bear is much taller than a Bear wins 9/10. Conan is a lion in spirit. The bear according to Wikipedia weights 389kg, the biggest tiger would have little to no chance against it. Polar Bear - 5 feet on all fours and more than 10 feet on hind legs. 8/10 on land, because they have been confused and preyed on before in the open. 5: Gorilla Vs Bengal/Siberian Tiger Fight takes place in a open bit of jungle. id put money on the kodiak bear. Grizzly takes it, though might die later due to infection Komodo dragons bite their prey, then wait for their venom to kill (this can take a few days to a week). According to your prompt, you stated them at their peak weights. So keeping that in mind the tiger would only win if it has the opportunity to ambush the bear. My Point is that an Grizzly would easily fuck three Well trained Pitbulls Up He says the opposite. Bear can tank some monke punches. All the bear got is his weight advantage but cats known to kill animals bigger than themselves. Yeah, for real. Reply reply. What also has to be considered are animal tendencies. If they were forced to fight I would expect the bear would win because their tough hide, thick fur & deep layers of fat would make it very difficult for the There's no such a thing as a 317kg tiger. A grizzly can probably kill a chimp with a single paw swipe. But I’d say grizzly bear wins 7/10 due to how insane their paw swipes are. Glass killed a bloodlusted grizzly bear with a fucking knife to the throat. The bear woukd still win though. 2 feet tall at the shoulder. It's already been proven conclusively by a team of scientists using simulation models and animatronics they built that a bear vs lion outcome is 10/10 to the bear, and typically it was its first or second strike of the fight. They clock in with a higher bite force than tigers. this says fight so im gonna assume there is no escaping and no guns. The T-Rex's head looks to be about 3-4 meters above the ground Tigers eat bears. They would be capable on killing one with a bite to the neck, but that’s a slim chance. Tiger 7/10. I've seen a vid of a bull completely fucking up a car. ago. Battle takes place in a snowy…. Badass pictures, gifs and videos of the awesome yet vicious cycle of nature. Gorilla google height - 1. Lion claws are around 1 1/2 inches. There’s a video of a grizzly bear chasing down a bison’s offspring and the mother doesn’t even bother defending the offspring. No reason for it to realistically ever happen. Grizzly Bear google weight - 180 to 360kg. Both maximum documented weight (Tiger 300kg. Mike Tyson is also fearless, so that would help him a lot. An enraged grizzly could almost tear off the tiger's head with a well placed claw swipe. Yes, one tiger versus one brown bear. Although not as big as the bear they are still extremely deadly in their own right and are smart enough to go for the neck, and while the grizzly has enough padding to protect their neck, a tiger that’s latched on to its neck for long enough could probably do some serious damage. Bad news for gorillas. It was stated earlier that the Grizzly has greater reach. If tigers can hunt a fully grown boar Ussuri brown bear, I think it can take on a grizzly bear relatively effortlessly, especially if the tiger got an ambush in. if gu zv mo vg dy zf bn em ml